3 ms·
Personally I'm a fan of cxs [0] which is (or purports to be) atomic among other strengths. From the readme: - 0.7 KB (gzipped) - Zero dependencies - High
by austinjp 6y ago
Personally I'm a fan of cxs [0] which is (or purports to be) atomic among other strengths. From the readme:
- 0.7 KB (gzipped)
- Zero dependencies
- High performance ("fast af")
- Deduplicates repeated styles
- Dead-code elimination
- Media queries and pseudoclasses supported
Works with any framework or with none, apparently, although I've only used it with Preact. Supports themes. Everything I need and nothing I don't.
[0] https://github.com/cxs-css/cxs https://github.com/cxs-css/cxs
- jitl 6y agoI think csx is probably the best choice amongst the compute-styles-at-runtime CSS-in-JS libraries. The brutal simplicity has a lot to offer. For most projects csx is perfectly fine. However it can’t beat a more complex zero-runtime precompiled styles system on paper — but it’s an optimization tradeoff you could choose if you need it in the future.