3 ms·
I certainly hope they can continue to collect the data. This article doesn't seem to mention it, but I wonder what kinds of false-positives come out of this met
by th0ma5 15y ago
I certainly hope they can continue to collect the data. This article doesn't seem to mention it, but I wonder what kinds of false-positives come out of this method, or if otherwise the noise can be factored out, and if the whole thing can be measured. Pretty compelling that in my lifetime I've seen both better tsunami and tornado warnings... maybe not the best, but way better than being in the complete dark even just 20 years ago.
- pedrokost 15y agoEarthquakes are really hard (if not possible) to predict. At least so it was until now. I would never have thought that we will be able to predict earthquakes once, even if only a few hours before the hazardous event. Unfortunately, I don't think this data is cheap enough to produce for most countries. It is expensive and as you said, it may produce some false alerts. However I would love to see in the coming months and years that this data is made publicly available in real time. I am pretty sure that making it available to the public would also permit more discoveries and correlations to be made.