Sorry. Maybe I replied badly. You've carefully looked at those details, which is good of you; and I replied in an unnuanced way Probably this is better: https:

Sorry. Maybe I replied badly. You've carefully looked at those details, which is good of you; and I replied in an unnuanced way Probably this is better: https://www.jurist.org/news/2020/09/un-experts-urge-security-council-to-refer-yemen-war-crimes-to-international-criminal-court/ https://www.jurist.org/news/2020/09/un-experts-urge-security... Or: https://www.economist.com/middle-east-and-africa/2020/04/18/saudi-arabia-looks-for-an-exit-to-the-war-in-yemen https://www.economist.com/middle-east-and-africa/2020/04/18/... Short, but I think it's fair to say the BBC is missing the real facts I used to think similarly to you. Would of believed the article's conclusion, and imagined we were doing good