3 ms·

> implying Apple is uniquely evil. It's not that they're uniquely evil, rather that they don't have the moral authority to lecture.

• zepto 6y ago
  Who are they lecturing on what?
  • AsyncAwait 6y ago
    App developers on what names are 'inappropriate', if you will.
    • zepto 6y ago
      I see that they made a commercial decision. I don’t see any moralizing or lecturing. Is there somewhere they are saying the name is morally wrong?
      • AsyncAwait 6y ago
        > Is there somewhere they are saying the name is morally wrong? Literally that wording? No. But that's the same as a politician doing favors for their biggest donor and then pretending there's no pay to play here since you didn't literally see him taking piles of banknotes in a smoke filled back room. Come on. > they made a commercial decision Yes but why? Because according to them it promotes objectionable items/behavior - that's a moral decision, it is also a commercial one but based on a moral judgment. A commercial decision is not a class on its own. It is taken based on some factors. What were the factors here if not that Apple finds the name/icon morally questionable?