What I am saying that hydrogen from natural gas has an incomparable economic advantage over electrolyzed hydrogen, and denying it is as silly as denying thermod

What I am saying that hydrogen from natural gas has an incomparable economic advantage over electrolyzed hydrogen, and denying it is as silly as denying thermodynamics. Electricity has to get tens of times cheaper for it to beat steam reforming, and you absolutely can't produce hydrogen cheaper than the energy you put into its production, most of which comes from, surprise, hydrocarbons. And obviously, you can't produce more hydrogen than the energy equivalent in hydrogen you consume. This completely crushes whatever ignoramuses thinking that you can "use hydrogen to produce more hydrogen"