3 ms·
Then by your own definition, and the statement issued by the EU commission, this is a bad investment. I've worked for the large, sclerotic organisations that o
by krona 6y ago
Then by your own definition, and the statement issued by the EU commission, this is a bad investment.
I've worked for the large, sclerotic organisations that once put man on the moon. They will take your 100bn, crush it in to dust, and outsource the production of 1 million pages of documentation in 32 languages detailing the workings of something your never asked for. All in the blink of an eye.
- scotty79 6y agoYes. It's bad investment for the one who pays. Possibly great for everybody else and humanity in general. If efficiency is your thing go into business. The smaller the better. But if you want to have a chance at literal moonshot stay in your job and swallow inefficiencies that come from size, ample capital, and no expectation of monetary profit.
- andi999 6y agoWhy 32 languages? I thought there is only one language in the country that put a man on the moon (apart from the one other language)