4 ms·
They're frustrated by free advertising and new customers? The smart thing to do is krep taking the business and just put a leaflet in the pizza box/whatever sa
by jimmaswell 6y ago
They're frustrated by free advertising and new customers?
The smart thing to do is krep taking the business and just put a leaflet in the pizza box/whatever saying ordering directly is cheaper/faster, if that's the case.
- danso 6y agoMaybe there's more involved than getting "free advertising and new customers". As in, "there ain't no such thing as a free lunch."
- jimktrains2 6y agoPerhaps frustrated that someone is doing business as them using their copyright and trademarks? These companies are basically commiting fraud, and any bad experience reflexts on the restaurant, not the delivery company. Sometimes the restaurant doesn't know that something is being ordered via another channel and cannot add sufh a slip.
- jiofih 6y agoThat “free” advertising is competing with your own channels (without the 30% commission). Also there are uncountable reports of them fucking up the delivery itself by not having appropriate containers, when the restaurant they are dealing doesn’t actually do deliveries. That will lose you customers and hurt your brand.
- tw25601814 6y agoIf it's such a bad deal, why is the restaurant continuing to service orders from the food delivery platform? It's not like they don't know who's placing the order.
- wolco2 6y agoPerhaps add a 30% markup fee for any grubhub customer or ubereats customer based on payment info or familiar faces/cars.
- cleak 6y agoI’m confused. How is GrubHub getting a 30% commission out of restaurants that don’t actively partner with them?
- nirushiv 6y agoI think they mean that other partnered restaurants get 30%. I could be misreading it though.
- CydeWeys 6y agoThey inflate menu prices and add additional service and delivery fees. You end up spending $50 on a meal that should be $30, and if you were shopping by amount of money spent (as many people are) then the net result is $30 going to the restaurant instead of all $50 you were willing to spend.
- cleak 6y agoSure, but that’s not actually a commission from the restaurant. The restaurant earns the same amount regardless of if it was true takeout or GrubHub (for folks that haven’t opted in to being partners).
- listenallyall 6y agosorry but at some point it's on the customer. if they are so price-insensitive that they are willing to pay $50 for $30 of food, they are too lazy to cross-reference the price, or shop around, or just go pick it up themselves, then I have no issue with the delivery service milking them for whatever the customer is willing to spend.
- jiofih 6y agoThey only do this ruse for a while, then after controlling a good chunk of the business they “sell” their services officially to the restaurant, including commission. It’s not a charity.
- cleak 6y agoBut it's up to the individual restaurants to agree to this. There's no automatic 30% commission. If a delivery company wants to burn their capital offering discounts, why stop them? The restaurant is under no obligation to sign a contract taking on the burden of kreping those discounts.
- vectorbunny 6y agoFrustrated by people having terrible customer service experiences associated with their business but completely out of their control.
- wpietri 6y ago> The smart thing to do is krep taking I think the smart thing to do is to trust that people who have spent years doing a thing have more insight into the topic than a random internet forum participant.