3 ms·
Why enforce existing law, we can you use this opportunity to create ever more complex laws to ensure stake holders that already abused to the condition the law
by syshum 6y ago
Why enforce existing law, we can you use this opportunity to create ever more complex laws to ensure stake holders that already abused to the condition the law is purporting to address can maintain their advantage and ensure no new entrants to the market
That is all this does, it protect GrubHub, DoorDash and other large players from competition
- jakelazaroff 6y agoHow, specifically, does this protect GrubHub/DoorDash/etc?
- syshum 6y agothis law is designed to protect those companies who already made billions on abusing existing laws by making it seem like what they did was legal, a "loophole" in the law that is now "closed" for new competitors They are not "new entrants" in the market, they have a network effect now so it will be preferable to them to sign exclusive deals with restaurants to further ensure there can not be any competition
- SamoyedFurFluff 6y agoSo the alternative should be that we should continue to funnel VC money into every new predatory impersonation business? Sometimes it really is a loophole that is now closed, and the government can’t subsequently dissolve all companies they’ve used it, they can only ask companies to stop.