3 ms·
I think GP is saying our scientific knowledge might not be 100% perfect, and we might not know one or two things until later. You're a bit over-reacting -- you
by high_density 6y ago
I think GP is saying our scientific knowledge might not be 100% perfect, and we might not know one or two things until later. You're a bit over-reacting -- you just made GP an anti-vaccer... maybe pointing out that we have better research tools and methodologies will do...
- gambiting 6y ago>>You're a bit over-reacting -- you just made GP an anti-vaccer. Oh god, that was not my intention in the slightest. All I wanted to say was that right now we have access to an immense amount of knowledge we can use to help ourselves make decisions, unlike Romans or even just people 100 years ago.
- high_density 6y ago> Oh god, that was not my intention in the slightest yes I can see that. but GP didn't actually say "5G is deadly", but "there might be something we don't know that can turn out to be harmful" > we have access to an immense amount of knowledge we can use to help ourselves make decisions the older-generations in the examples by GP could have been thinking the same thing. we all know better than older-gens, and future-gens will probably know better than us Anyway, just don't try to attacking too soon -- might hinder discussion / research-attempts / etc