Right. But I'm not just moving essential to a different place. I am describing how complexity is made essential or accidental based on where you are in the stac

Right. But I'm not just moving essential to a different place. I am describing how complexity is made essential or accidental based on where you are in the stack. It actually unifies your theory and Brooks, and I don't what others have stated as arguments against it. As an accountant staring at a computer, everything about the computer is accidental. Saying simply that the computer is accidental regardless of context is not very useful apart from for refuting Brooks.