3 ms·
Indeed. This is why hydro shouldn't be considered green energy. (That, and the methane reduced when hundreds or thousands of hectares of living, breathing land
by paledot 6y ago
Indeed. This is why hydro shouldn't be considered green energy. (That, and the methane reduced when hundreds or thousands of hectares of living, breathing land are flooded and decompose in an anoxic environment.)
- AdamJacobMuller 6y agoDoes anyone consider hydro as green anymore? Nuclear has far less impact.
- stjohnswarts 6y agoVery few people consider nuclear power as "green". It's better than almost all the alternatives but those arguments don't work with you average citizen any longer so nuclear power is plateaued for the forseeable future in Western nations.
- 908B64B197 6y ago> This is why hydro shouldn't be considered green energy. Minuscule emissions when it's built that are amortized over a 50 year lifespan qualifies as very green in my books. The idea that it's not green anymore is absolutely ridiculous. I sometime wonder if environmentalism greatest threat isn't... environmentalists themselves!