3 ms·
I completely disagree. Downvotes and upvotes are the entire reason why I come here. They are not perfect but it's a relatively simple way to moderate content. I
by oramit 6y ago
I completely disagree. Downvotes and upvotes are the entire reason why I come here. They are not perfect but it's a relatively simple way to moderate content. I don't want to see every article submitted to this site or read inane comments. As a niche site there is still a good signal to noise ratio with the discussion here. Generally speaking the community does a good job of policing itself and I can't see how removing the downvote feature will improve anything.
I agree that downvotes are crude so instead of removing them you could improve them. How about when you downvote you have to choose a reason eg:
1. Comment is off-topic
2. Poor argument / source
3. Combatitive / abusive
Side note - there is no internet discourse more eye-rolling than whining about how you can't express an "unpopular" idea. Just say what you want to say - I swear you are significantly less edgy than you think.
Also, you're not allowed to downvote this comment. That would be suppressing my speech and such a chilling effect is disturbing.
- claytongulick 6y agoWhy would I downvote? I think it contributes, and I also happen to agree with a lot of your points, if not perhaps, the tone.
- onecommentman 6y agoYou don’t come here for upvotes and downvotes, much less the entire reason. You come here for well-moderated discussion by whatever instrument appropriate. Why the hyperbole?
- grzm 6y ago> you're not allowed to downvote this comment 'claytongulick can't downvote the comment regardless: just as one can't downvote a reply to a comment, a submitter can't downvote top-level comments on their submission.