3 ms·
The article uses the term. If there is a star in the sky and I see it, I don’t consume it so that you can see it too. But if I occupy a spot, I “consume” that
by Swenrekcah 6y ago
The article uses the term.
If there is a star in the sky and I see it, I don’t consume it so that you can see it too.
But if I occupy a spot, I “consume” that so you can’t be there simultaneously.
So there is rivalry if we both want to be there.
- chrisseaton 6y agoYes but 'in non-rivalrous' doesn't make any sense.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- whoisburbansky 6y agoIt took coming down to your comment to realize that GP had “in non-rivalrous,” I’d just glossed it over and assumed it said “is”