3 ms·
I'd expect that as in most other cases, it would come down to payback time, wouldn't it? With the floor being "pays for itself before it reaches end of life".
by slfnflctd 6y ago
I'd expect that as in most other cases, it would come down to payback time, wouldn't it? With the floor being "pays for itself before it reaches end of life".
If it doesn't pay for its own existence, it's likely a waste of effort. But if it does, you're adding capabilities & flexibility for zero cost. I don't really see a downside, other than tying up the capital.
- kakkan 6y agoHi slfnflctd! You replied to my comment on a thread on LSD trips some 42 odd days ago, and I kind of missed it when you posted it but I just stumbled upon it today and found your comment to be really insightful and I could relate to it really well. I think I could learn more from you if you were open to a discussion. I was wondering if we could connect through email or any other platform of your choice?
- baybal2 6y agoWhat I am saying that hydrogen from natural gas has an incomparable economic advantage over electrolyzed hydrogen, and denying it is as silly as denying thermodynamics. Electricity has to get tens of times cheaper for it to beat steam reforming, and you absolutely can't produce hydrogen cheaper than the energy you put into its production, most of which comes from, surprise, hydrocarbons. And obviously, you can't produce more hydrogen than the energy equivalent in hydrogen you consume. This completely crushes whatever ignoramuses thinking that you can "use hydrogen to produce more hydrogen"