3 ms·
I've been using the Beta version of Photostructure[0] for a while and am generally very happy with it. It doesn't have all the bells and whistles, no ML etc, b
by gingerlime 6y ago
I've been using the Beta version of Photostructure[0] for a while and am generally very happy with it.
It doesn't have all the bells and whistles, no ML etc, but it's also much lighter. Running on my Synology NAS inside a docker container just fine (with ~30k photos).
I also heard about Mylio[1] which looks nice, but haven't tried it. Somehow the privacy policy left me a little more concerned compared to the bold promises elsewhere. The pricing model also feels a bit off to me.
Neither are open-source though.
[0] https://photostructure.com/ https://photostructure.com/
[1] https://mylio.com/ https://mylio.com/
- Fire-Dragon-DoL 6y agoI've been using photostructure for a while, but it lacks everything related to albums which is the most important part to me.
- mceachen 6y agoHowdy! I'm the author of PhotoStructure. The next release (I expect alpha builds to be available in a week or two) has album support: including automatic album importing from Google Takeouts. https://forum.photostructure.com/t/support-for-manually-created-albums/103 https://forum.photostructure.com/t/support-for-manually-crea... This next release is a biggie, btw: https://photostructure.com/about/2020-release-notes/#vnext https://photostructure.com/about/2020-release-notes/#vnext
- sampling 6y agoWhich Synology NAS model did you go with, and how are you finding the performance? Thanks