4 ms·
> The author argues that a tool like Flash the authoring software should exist, but makes no argument about Flash the runtime. Yes, this is what I meant. Sorry
by tapirl 6y ago
> The author argues that a tool like Flash the authoring software should exist, but makes no argument about Flash the runtime.
Yes, this is what I meant. Sorry, I didn't clarify this in the replied comment.
> it isn't the nature of HTML which is the problem
It is in some degrees. The same html/js code might run some differently in different browsers, from either behaviors or performance aspects.
On the other hand, Flash runtime only presents some small behavior differences on different OSes or with different CPU architectures. And for different OSes/browser combos with the same-power CPUs+GPUs, there is almost no performance differences.
- wastholm 6y ago> On the other hand, Flash runtime only presents some small behavior differences on different OSes or with different CPU architectures. And for different OSes/browser combos with the same-power CPUs+GPUs, there is almost no performance differences. Really? Last time I used Flash, a few years ago when it still mattered, it used 100% CPU just to play video on Linux. The Windows version didn't seem to have this problem and I deduced that Adobe just didn't care about Linux.