3 ms·

Or just use FreeBSD if you really care about secure by default.

• jmnicolas 6y ago
  According to the author: > Despite popular belief, OpenBSD's security is actually lacking in a lot of ways. https://madaidans-insecurities.github.io/openbsd.html https://madaidans-insecurities.github.io/openbsd.html It's probably not better on FreeBSD.
• andi999 6y ago
  I did this, and 1 month later got bad emails about shutting down the server because of ntp vulnerability. Maybe it was just a new vulnerability found at that time, but then this brings me to the missing item of the text: how to keep up? What pages tell you about new found vulnerabilities, so you can mitigate.
  • randmeerkat 6y ago
    There’s a few resources listed here: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/security-advisories.html https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/security-advisories.htm...
    • andi999 6y ago
      Thanks. I am always puzzled why linux on server is more popular than BSD.
• unixhero 6y ago
  Isn't that OpenBSD?
  • pram 6y ago
    The only thing OpenBSD secures you from is good performance
    • unixhero 6y ago
      Lol. Yes I have observed that there is a massive performance hit. But OpenBSD is packaged for, shipped for and boots nicely on obscure hardware. So I am still around.