3 ms·

There are people in my town running for office who absolutely do believe that Q is the only trustworthy source of information, have declared so in public, and r

There are people in my town running for office who absolutely do believe that Q is the only trustworthy source of information, have declared so in public, and receive a nontrivial amount of support from folks who agree. You may have tried to use hyperbole to illustrate a point, but you wound up looking like you're trying to either discredit a news organization you don't like or legitimize a bullshit artist by placing the two on equal terms. It came across as disingenuous at best and you don't seem to be willing to recognize that divergence from your stated intentions. Why is that?

guscost 6y ago
NPR is basically a state propaganda outfit that pretends to be a “neutral” and objective source, although its organization and methods are very different from those of the Q entity. Both sources have many die-hard followers who utterly fail to question their output, or understand their conflicts of interest. It is a simple and consistent argument, even if you don’t want to believe it, and even if you are right to dislike the spice.