You are right. I had to re-read the article with fresh eyes, hah! My first reading had left me with the impression that they were keen to introduce all the nega

You are right. I had to re-read the article with fresh eyes, hah! My first reading had left me with the impression that they were keen to introduce all the negative aspects as early as possible for the sake of "neutrality" and "transparency" ... hence my comment. But now that I re-read it, it's probably not the case. D'oh.