That's very close but not quite right (unless I misunderstood what you wrote). See: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#LGPLStaticVsDynamic https://www

That's very close but not quite right (unless I misunderstood what you wrote). See: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#LGPLStaticVsDynamic https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#LGPLStaticVsDyn... As long as a relinkable form of the closed source executable and/or sources of the LGPL library/ies it uses are provided in an acceptable way (per LGPL terms) then distributing a closed source executable should not be problematic.