This is not true, and the and a good example of conspiratorial rationalization. Why doesn't Mike Pence, the VP back your claims? Are you saying you have more

This is not true, and the and a good example of conspiratorial rationalization. Why doesn't Mike Pence, the VP back your claims? Are you saying you have more information that him? Why don't any GOP Senators? Judges? Consider if 'bad elections' claims had any merit whatsoever, the real GOP apparatus would be running full tilt at the problem. The Supreme Court would practically be inviting cases. Arguing that 'irregularities exist' is not an argument - because we know they exist, what matters is the magnitude and systematic efforts. The 'conspiratorial argument' falls apart immediately under any scrutiny - and there has been a lot of scrutiny. So we have a problem with giving out money, and appearance of problems in voting, maybe we can have 'voter ID' and get around some of the legitimacy/privacy issues. But the elections are effectively fair. Please try to understand that this is an issue of public communications and conspiratorial logic, and not reality. The 'ministries of truth' have considerably more integrity - especially as a whole - then