I wasn't speaking about any particular section of the paper. Happy to hear your thoughts on it though! Ultimately though, they're irrelevant to my point, which

I wasn't speaking about any particular section of the paper. Happy to hear your thoughts on it though! Ultimately though, they're irrelevant to my point, which is that even if you personally dislike the conclusions of the paper, even if you disagree, it is an existence proof of thoughtful and deep analysis of broader impact. You are more than welcome to dislike the concept. But it still remains present.