I recognize that you understand it as an act of charity. That by giving much more than necessary to employees, he is pro-employee. He is legally entitled to the

I recognize that you understand it as an act of charity. That by giving much more than necessary to employees, he is pro-employee. He is legally entitled to the profit, after all. I see it as: his employees created the vast majority of the profit he enjoys. He didn't work thousands of times harder than his $15/hr workers after all. I'm not making a moral judgement here. Notice I'm not saying what he should or shouldn't do. But I think it's a mistake to call him pro-employee. In fact I do applaud his personal actions. We both understand the employees are not entitled to the profit. His giving back is a wonderful move for his employees. He seems like a wonderful CEO to work under and probably a great person.