3 ms·

You can't just compare it that simply, use the NYT Rent/Buy Calculator for a more in-depth analysis. [1] Renting is generally cheaper than buying, especially i

• g00gler 6y ago
  > Most people don't consider all costs associated with buying a house which include closing costs (when you sell as well, renting has no such costs), property tax, maintenance, insurance, HOA, etc... 100%. I was in escrow on what would have been my first home purchase. The amount of money that goes into just buying a house was insane. After the sale fell through I ran the numbers for my parents home and much like the article says over the last 25 years or so they made next to nothing or maybe even lost money after interest, taxes, upkeep, etc even though the cash value went up over 30%
  • dahart 6y ago
    > so they made next to nothing or maybe even lost money after interest, taxes, upkeep, etc Don't forget that you can "lose money" on a house and still be basically ~100% ahead of where you'd be if you had rented. The only way that renting actually comes out ahead is if you're actively and aggressively investing amounts larger than your would-be down payment, and making consistent profits for the duration that are larger than bank loan interest rates. FWIW I'm on my 2nd house, and the costs listed have never felt like they change the balance of the equation at all. I don't have HOA, most people don't (unlike all the other costs listed, HOA is a choice, you don't have to buy into a neighborhood with HOA dues). The other costs are somewhat in the noise. Closing costs are a one time thing, think of them as part of the purchase price, nothing to think about later. Tax and maintenance are ongoing but not very large (and don't forget rent is also paying tax and maintenance, bundled). The biggest additional costs of owning a house for me have been remodeling, but so far those have come back to me with returns, in the form of a higher sale price on the house.
• caminocorner 6y ago
  > Renting is generally cheaper than buying That's not 'generally' true, unless youre cherry picking data or buying expensive houses. If that was true, then landlords wouldn't be renting their property out. The standard landlord advice (from any real estate book) is to charge more for rent than your mortgage costs to cover unexpected repairs. Also, several deductions for tax, maintenance, repairs, insurance, etc exist making it even cheaper. https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/top-ten-tax-deductions-landlords-29497.html https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/top-ten-tax-deductio... I agree with you that owning a home is expensive and I caution friends from buying a home if they're not sure they want to live there for 5-15 years. The hidden costs are insane. Renting has a mostly stable price without the massive emergency spikes of making roof or foundation repairs.
  • vecinu 6y ago
    > That's not 'generally' true Yes, you're correct, I'm mainly referring to California as that's where I've been living for a good chunk of time. Prop 13 "locks in" your property tax rate with measly 1-2%/year increases and there is barely any new construction, restricting supply. What this means is that a lot of landlords in CA have super low mortgage/property tax costs because they bought a while ago and they can "afford" to charge a low amount of rent because their costs are so low. The biggest factor for me in regards to buying is the mobility that I need, especially while I'm young and uncertain of where I want to settle.