2 ms·
their website has a good explainer of the differences (uses 2 different adenoviruses, which are also different from the ones the AZ vaccine uses): https://sputn
by cblconfederate 6y ago
their website has a good explainer of the differences (uses 2 different adenoviruses, which are also different from the ones the AZ vaccine uses): https://sputnikvaccine.com/about-vaccine/ https://sputnikvaccine.com/about-vaccine/
Their Phase 1/2 results were published in Lancet[1], which also printed an opinion about the politics of the vaccine[2]
They have reported their final data for their phase 3 study in a press releace which states they will be published in a journal soon [3].
1. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31866-3/fulltext https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6...
2. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(20)30709-X/fulltext https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3...
3. https://sputnikvaccine.com/newsroom/pressreleases/the-sputnik-v-vaccine-s-efficacy-is-confirmed-at-91-4-based-on-data-analysis-of-the-final-control-po/ https://sputnikvaccine.com/newsroom/pressreleases/the-sputni...
- iainmerrick 6y agoThanks for that second link especially, this is exactly what I was looking for! It sounds like much of the communication and release of scientific data has been bad, but in general the approach is sound and it’s likely to work well. The same criticism about miscommunication could be (and has been) levelled at AZ, over the full-dose/half-dose mix-up.