3 ms·
> Through exactly which sources, and in what dosages? So any teflon product, non-stick pots and pans, waterproof clothing and furniture, self cleaning ovens, mi
by NiceWayToDoIT 6y ago
> Through exactly which sources, and in what dosages?
So any teflon product, non-stick pots and pans, waterproof clothing and furniture, self cleaning ovens, microwave popcorn bags, pizza boxes, and much much more... Non-sticky nature, has a nature of non-sticking to those products as well :P it seems ...
Through those products goes directly into the body, and then when it is disposed goes to landfills, from there to water ...
> "alright, well I should limit my exposure to these things by this much, and keep an eye out for these symptoms, and we should enact these measures to prevent further harm".
As I said, you cannot, you are already poisoned, and you cannot remove it from the nature. You can just try to stop "mustache-twirling villains" to do the future harm, as they shown in 2019 they are capable of simply giving Zero Fs for what public wants.
Additionally, calling them "mustache-twirling villains" it is downplaying danger turning it into the light comedy piece, which will make public care even less about the issue. Just imagine I poison you and then when you get angry I use perfect stand up comedian skills and everyone laugh at you, and say "don't worry you will be fine, people dying anyway" - (Which was exact sentence of the women from Scotland refusing to wear the mask during Corona virus pandemic while she was thrown out of the airplane)
- yellowapple 6y ago> Additionally, calling them "mustache-twirling villains" it is downplaying danger turning it into the light comedy piece, My point is that the author's reliance on hyperbolic and emotionally-charged language is what makes the article read like a light comedy piece. It's exactly the sort of rhetoric employed by anti-vaxxers and chemtrail believers, and it cheapens the message. The facts are damning enough. Let them speak for themselves.