I appreciate your opinion on this and I don't quite understand it. What if the arguments against something are simply dramatically weaker than the arguments fo

I appreciate your opinion on this and I don't quite understand it. What if the arguments against something are simply dramatically weaker than the arguments for it? Does that still mean you really don't know your case? In my experience, sometimes (often) there really is a very clear winner, though my experience does not include anything historical at all.