3 ms·
They did act. > They saw no evidence of a crime and had no authority to enter his home or fenced property They did their due diligence and couldn’t do anythin
by colejohnson66 6y ago
They did act.
> They saw no evidence of a crime and had no authority to enter his home or fenced property
They did their due diligence and couldn’t do anything more. Are we supposed to live in such a police state where a single warning would be enough to ruin your life?
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- sneak 6y ago> They did their due diligence Police in the US have no duty or obligation to investigate, prevent, or respond to crime, or complaints of crime/potential crime in any way. There is no such thing as "due diligence" when it comes to policing. It is a common misconception. They are not obligated to police.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- colejohnson66 6y agoIf they have no duty to anyone, then they went above and beyond their duties by investigating at least somewhat. So again, why are we upset at them?