3 ms·
Answer is yes but you are much lower priority than others, bottom of the priority stack. CDC made a huge mistake not clarifying this, and this mistake will make
by mchusma 6y ago
Answer is yes but you are much lower priority than others, bottom of the priority stack. CDC made a huge mistake not clarifying this, and this mistake will make it take significantly longer for us to hit herd immunity.
There is very little chance you can catch it again if you already,and if you did it is likely to not be severe. But the immunity conferred by vaccines is often stronger and longer lasting from vaccines than from the disease itself. It's likely the case here based on preliminary numbers, but still not fully prove.
- chrisco255 6y agoNo. The answer isn't "yes". And you have linked to absolutely no studies to affirm whether this brand new vaccine is more effective than natural antibodies long-term. No such studies have been conducted.
- respinal 6y agohttps://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/05/health/covid-natural-immunity.html https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/05/health/covid-natural-immu...
- chrisco255 6y agoUnless you've got an academic study with a clinical trial of two sets of populations one with natural antibodies, one with vaccination, and perhaps a third without it, you don't know and NYT doesn't know. The vaccine was rushed, showed maybe a 90% efficacy. There's not evidence of widespread Covid relapses after natural immunity is achieved. There's also literally no long term data on this vaccine, because it's brand new.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]