In your example from the article, it talks about how voters did vote in the company's best interests, which keeps those companies in line with the framework use

In your example from the article, it talks about how voters did vote in the company's best interests, which keeps those companies in line with the framework used in the rest of the country. Was that an intentionally undermining of whatever point had set out to make? Because I can dissect that part too, which is also the same as the rest of the country: nobody else really runs for these positions.