I get confused, when I read the term "society monster", as I think it's a loaded term, that is not reflective of the language used in the article Arguing for m

I get confused, when I read the term "society monster", as I think it's a loaded term, that is not reflective of the language used in the article Arguing for more wealth equality is not the same as saying "billionaires are monsters", but having a few people able to fund lobbying and influence political systems, simply because of their wealth, while a large part of the population are cut off from participating in the democratic process, because they do not have the resources for education and the stability to commit long-term to a cause, is in my opinion a death sentence to modern democracy