3 ms·

If the mechanics were sufficient, why are people not posting more pictures of airliners flying into buildings in Flight Simulator? It is a simulator, so it has

If the mechanics were sufficient, why are people not posting more pictures of airliners flying into buildings in Flight Simulator? It is a simulator, so it has the best mechanics. The violence is the only thing missing. Flight Simulator will just display a boring dialog saying "you crashed".

totony 6y ago
There's a middle ground where mechanics are fun but not too easy; flight simulator is just too hard to be that fun in my experience.
Groxx 6y ago
Because flying into a building doesn't gain you any benefits in the game. It's not part of a goal, it has no purpose. Since it's not part of the mechanics: as you point out, it's not (frequently) done. That seems to support the claim that it's not about seeking violence.
- devenvdev 6y ago
  As someone who flew an airplain into the statue of liberty on purpose (in a simulator of course) - it was purely out of interest what will the game do, not violence. The same goes for the torture scene in GTA5, it didn't "feel" violent, it felt like you playing a part of the story in an alternative reality. Again, out of curiosity, going along with all the torture methods available.
  - Groxx 6y ago
    There is definitely an element of "find the edges of the simulation" / "learn the system better" / "see everything" in a lot of these, along with just enjoying a spectacle. E.g. in Kerbal Space Program I often "reset" bad airplane flights by crashing into the ground as fast as I can, or one of the space center buildings if I'm nearby. I could just hit esc and reset and be back faster, but then I don't see an explosion, nor have a chance to see messed up physics breaking the universe. I've also coordinated orbital collisions to do the same, but there it's more because it's extremely challenging to achieve at any reasonable velocity. I have no desire to crash real planes or blow up space stations though. The closest that gets to the real world is "I like fireworks".

totony 6y ago

There's a middle ground where mechanics are fun but not too easy; flight simulator is just too hard to be that fun in my experience.

Groxx 6y ago

Because flying into a building doesn't gain you any benefits in the game. It's not part of a goal, it has no purpose. Since it's not part of the mechanics: as you point out, it's not (frequently) done. That seems to support the claim that it's not about seeking violence.

devenvdev 6y ago
As someone who flew an airplain into the statue of liberty on purpose (in a simulator of course) - it was purely out of interest what will the game do, not violence. The same goes for the torture scene in GTA5, it didn't "feel" violent, it felt like you playing a part of the story in an alternative reality. Again, out of curiosity, going along with all the torture methods available.
- Groxx 6y ago
  There is definitely an element of "find the edges of the simulation" / "learn the system better" / "see everything" in a lot of these, along with just enjoying a spectacle. E.g. in Kerbal Space Program I often "reset" bad airplane flights by crashing into the ground as fast as I can, or one of the space center buildings if I'm nearby. I could just hit esc and reset and be back faster, but then I don't see an explosion, nor have a chance to see messed up physics breaking the universe. I've also coordinated orbital collisions to do the same, but there it's more because it's extremely challenging to achieve at any reasonable velocity. I have no desire to crash real planes or blow up space stations though. The closest that gets to the real world is "I like fireworks".