You're right. In my opinion there are good reasons for physical property to exist (individual freedom), but avoiding violence is not the best theoretical argum

You're right. In my opinion there are good reasons for physical property to exist (individual freedom), but avoiding violence is not the best theoretical argument for it. Is physical property against freedom or in favor of freedom? I think both, depending how you look at it. I've though about this a lot, and tend to fall on the side of proprietarianism, because I think property is absolutely necessary for the fulfillment of human needs and desires.