3 ms·

I think that’s the only requirement. It guarantees everyone’s private property and that’s it.

• yters 6y ago
  But as long as you have government you need funds, which means tax, which means threat of force.
  • trianglem 6y ago
    Yeah I think they’re okay with a tax for military/police purposes. Either ways I don’t identify with that mindset because it would lead to a whole hog ripping out of civil liberties which probably means things like slavery (albeit not race specific) and back to the kitchen for women.
    • yters 6y ago
      Maybe the libertarian I talk to is not representative, but he thinks even military and police are not valid government functions, since they necessitate taxes, which necessitate levying monies from people with an underlying threat of force.