3 ms·
> no bad press Not bad press. The stolen materials of a state-sponsored attack released at the precise time it would do the most damage. And people are claimi
by seppin 6y ago
> no bad press
Not bad press. The stolen materials of a state-sponsored attack released at the precise time it would do the most damage. And people are claiming with a straight face this was a coincidence and Wikileaks wasn't working with Russian intelligence, against the American democratic party.