4 ms·

How many people have been arrested correctly based on this tech? How does that compare to people looking at photos/suspects? If it's better, this is an improvem

How many people have been arrested correctly based on this tech? How does that compare to people looking at photos/suspects? If it's better, this is an improvement even if its not perfect... >The detective compared Mr. Parks’s New Jersey state I.D. to the fake Tennessee driver’s license and agreed it was the same person So there was also some human error in the ID then... Interestingly London police (The Met) have a special group of people who do this job manually and are considered very good. I wonder how the AI vs them vs the average panes out...

treeman79 6y ago
Well there is the normal guy redneck drivers license guy. https://m.imgur.com/gallery/uqmUs https://m.imgur.com/gallery/uqmUs
MikeUt 6y ago
> How many people have been arrested correctly based on this tech? How does that compare to people looking at photos/suspects? The New York Times does not consider that information relevant.
seesawtron 6y ago
>So there was also some human error in the ID then... Most of these systems only alert the agencies about possible persons of interest. In the end its the "human" that makes the decision/error but that part doesn't make the story sexy.