> Why is this ethical responsibility somehow always offloaded to the consumer? Because without consumer, there would be no incentive for either China and Apple

> Why is this ethical responsibility somehow always offloaded to the consumer? Because without consumer, there would be no incentive for either China and Apple to behave amorally. China is a totalitarian dictatorship. As long as it's citizens don't rebel, they have no incentive to change their behavior. Apple is a publicly traded company. They need good publicity. So, as a humanist, I say it's up to the consumers to force Apple to stop contributing to human rights abuses.