3 ms·
Hard to blame non-technical people when even programmers happen to use md5. Anyway, why such documents don’t refer to auxiliary standards with big ass year of
by rasguanabana 6y ago
Hard to blame non-technical people when even programmers happen to use md5.
Anyway, why such documents don’t refer to auxiliary standards with big ass year of creation somewhere on top? That might ring a bell if you’re about to use something from 3 decades ago and you have a hint it’s security related.
- danaris 6y agoThere's a big difference between still using a very-common hashing algorithm that happens to no longer be secure, and discussing the use of programs that haven't actually existed in decades.
- rasguanabana 6y agoOh I was referring to the other part of article about document recommending usage of algorithms such as 1024 bit RSA and SHA-1.