3 ms·
Don't miss a followup https://tailscale.com/blog/two-internets-both-flakey/ https://tailscale.com/blog/two-internets-both-flakey/
by xaduha 6y ago
Don't miss a followup https://tailscale.com/blog/two-internets-both-flakey/ https://tailscale.com/blog/two-internets-both-flakey/
- ryanianian 6y agoTailscale continues to delight me every day. I wish I could pay them for them my modest little use-case of remotely-accessing my ham radio and my rpis. Before tailscale I relied on flaky upnp or "configuring my router" and trying to bust through nats. Not sure IPv6 would have helped this at all given how hostile ISPs are.
- cassianoleal 6y agoI'm not sure about the specifics of your setup, but it sounds like ZeroTier could help you there. I run it on my router as a Layer 2 bridge, and a client on each "road warrior" device (laptop, phone, etc). For my laptop, I even rely on self-hosted services for many things, including DNS and I have no noticeable latency even when on a crappy network. For context, all of that is running behind CGNAT for IPv4, which is very impressive.
- breatheoften 6y agoI'm looking for a solution to the problem of exposing a port on my laptop port to the internet (let's say for example purposes: ssh server port) from whatever network my laptop happens to be connected to ... I want to be able to initiate connections back to my laptop from random devices which are connected to the internet via network infrastructure that I don't control ... Can tailscale give me that without me having to setup my own network infra somewhere? I loved these two articles and feel some amount of trust for the author's company based on the communication style and knowledge sharing -- just wondering before I dive in whether this tech offers a good solution to my problem?
- ryanianian 6y agoIf you can install tailscale on it you can join your private tailscale mesh network from it.
- oarsinsync 6y agoFrom the follow up: > IP mobility is what we do, in a small way, with Tailscale’s WireGuard connections. We try all your Internet links, IPv4 and IPv6, UDP and TCP From the wireguard website[0]: > WireGuard explicitly does not support tunneling over TCP, due to the classically terrible network performance of tunneling TCP-over-TCP. Rather, transforming WireGuard's UDP packets into TCP is the job of an upper layer of obfuscation (see previous point), and can be accomplished by projects like udptunnel and udp2raw. I assume this means Tailscale has their own client where they’ve bolted this on themselves? [0]: https://www.wireguard.com/known-limitations/ https://www.wireguard.com/known-limitations/
- xaduha 6y agoEh, I sort of ignored the plug at the end. It's not really what the issue is about, completely different scale.