4 ms·
Unfortunately, just as a matter of historical accuracy, this is secondhand information, and both of the hands are unreliable. There's no real proof Ehrlichman s
by apsec112 6y ago
Unfortunately, just as a matter of historical accuracy, this is secondhand information, and both of the hands are unreliable. There's no real proof Ehrlichman said this (it was claimed by a journalist many years after his death), and Ehrlichman was a known liar who was convicted of perjury, so he's a non-credible source in the first place.
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/hjeu1a/according_to_many_nixons_aide_john_erlichman https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/hjeu1a/accor...
- 29athrowaway 6y agoThe absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence.
- nyolfen 6y agowell, then it is probably good that GP is saying that you are presenting unreliable evidence