3 ms·
I think what OP means is rather than trying to fix deceases one by one, why aren't we focusing more on the root cause (aging)? This seems like a much more effic
by DrRobinson 6y ago
I think what OP means is rather than trying to fix deceases one by one, why aren't we focusing more on the root cause (aging)? This seems like a much more efficient way of solving many of these things. There are a bunch of initiatives in this area already, but not nearly enough to be proportional to the potential.
> but you can't just spend a trillion dollars and make people live an extra decade.
This I don't get though. Why not? We already do that. Making people healthier for longer is a massive win.
- koheripbal 6y agoBecause aging isn't "one thing" that breaks. There are a multitude of things that break down, and when you fix one, another one seems to pop up. It's like growing a factory. expanding the bandwidth on one component, just pushes the bottleneck elsewhere.