3 ms·
I would prefer that there is a strict penalty for people who rely too much on their tool that they can't even do their jobs correctly. I'd fire a carpenter if a
by KittenInABox 6y ago
I would prefer that there is a strict penalty for people who rely too much on their tool that they can't even do their jobs correctly. I'd fire a carpenter if an AI told the carpenter to fuck up my cabinet, because I expect my carpenter to double-check. Similarly if the carpenter finds the AI consistently useless and an avenue to get their ass sued, then they'll decline to purchase shit AI.
- agnosticmantis 6y agoI agree. The penalty on the user of AI would in turn incentivize the user to penalize/reward the AI developer. But I’m not sure if it’s reasonable to require every user to be able to assess the long run accuracy of a statistical system given their limited interaction. Maybe there’s a market for companies to reliably assess and certify AI systems or by creating a sort of a prediction market that penalize overconfident false positives.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]