3 ms·
Oh come on, you don't need the user to set anything. Just do a once a year checkup 'hey there, here's all the stuff you said you own, did anything break or dete
by tomaskafka 6y ago
Oh come on, you don't need the user to set anything. Just do a once a year checkup 'hey there, here's all the stuff you said you own, did anything break or deteriorate?'
I'll be happy to help you if it's two minutes once a year, and I think that's all the info you need.
- hubraumhugo 6y agoYou are right, that's even better! Will implement it like this.
- tomaskafka 6y agoGreat! I have done some user research for a similar problem, and what users look for in reviews is mainly a list of potential problems, so that they can decide if they can deal with them or if they are dealbreakers.
- composer 6y agoThat is also a good idea because people are motivated more to act when something goes wrong; and a close second is when they are excited to share a good discovery. The DefaultReviews [1] gist may offer some guidance: "...rating by default is the equivalent of saying "everything is okay". That rating is made without you having to lift a finger. You only have to lift a finger to change it to "awesome" or to "sucks" or to add a elaboration for others to read." Also, the final section of DefaultReviews [1] may also help solve your inevitable problem with faked reviews. Pull requests welcome. [1] https://gist.github.com/iL3D/59df64947d42828d848ebfc1651a3122 https://gist.github.com/iL3D/59df64947d42828d848ebfc1651a312...
- hubraumhugo 6y agoOh I love this! Have you ever built the app?