5 ms·
There's no need to engage in hypotheticals here. Statistically speaking, dogs are much less likely per capita to injure/kill a human, than a human doing the sa
by antisthenes 6y ago
There's no need to engage in hypotheticals here.
Statistically speaking, dogs are much less likely per capita to injure/kill a human, than a human doing the same to another human.
Humans are violent apes, whereas dogs (with very few breeds being exceptions) have been bred for 5,000 years for docility/companionship.
- bitcharmer 6y ago> There's no need to engage in hypotheticals here Yet here we are, hypothesising. Also, statistically speaking dogs are less likely to come up with new methods of improving life on earth or even simply helping out other creatures in need.