3 ms·
I understand your point. My question, though, is: for what languages is this statement not true: " < language > is only safe if the authors of such code take a
by bird_monster 6y ago
I understand your point. My question, though, is: for what languages is this statement not true:
" < language > is only safe if the authors of such code take advantage of the features that the language provides to write safe code "
- tome 6y agoIt's not a binary classification of "Haskell safe, everything else unsafe". It's a gradation. Haskell provides more such features and more ergonomically (goes the claim, and it's one I happen to agree with).
- andi999 6y agoWell, while python still has 2 or 3 gotchas, I think it can be called safe (now the question for me arises what do we actually mean by safe).