4 ms·
Nobody really needs someone with 30 years of general experience because each such person is unique, impossible to completely replace. If you have the level of e
by barry-cotter 6y ago
Nobody really needs someone with 30 years of general experience because each such person is unique, impossible to completely replace. If you have the level of expertise that comes from real understanding of six different fields attained from five years of good work in them you might literally be the only person with that combination of skills. There are definitely under a 1,000 of you. If you have 30 years of experience but maybe five of real learning then you’re presumably competent but you’re not super special, just competent and known to be competent. After 30 years in the same field you could be one of those people with serious deep expertise. Those people are valuable but the market is thin. You need to make your skills known so work finds you through your network, or you need to become a consultant in spirit if not fact and sell. Loudly trumpet your expertise.
- user5994461 6y agoI don't think there's many technologies that are 30 years old that are still relevant today. Most programming languages themselves are younger than that: Python 1991, Java 1996, C# 2002, go 2012. C++ and COBOL are ancient enough but niche. If we look at tools/frameworks, the story is even worse because they were obviously created later (plus some time to gain traction). I think the industry will slow down and stabilize over the next 20 years. It will be fragmented in different area of expertise, but there won't be another 10 new languages or another internet revolution.