> If it's too long to be read, then are all those details really necessary? My take is that those details are intentionally left in as is to ensure that the st

> If it's too long to be read, then are all those details really necessary? My take is that those details are intentionally left in as is to ensure that the status quo remains exactly the same, thus ensuring that updating a piece of legislation has no unintended consequences. I mean, if the legislation remains the exact same, even citing the exact same software as reference, then there is no doubt regarding where jurisprudence stands.