3 ms·

> And it’s rather disingenuous how you keep rocking back and forth between current generation consoles I never did. I never mentioned current generation consol

> And it’s rather disingenuous how you keep rocking back and forth between current generation consoles I never did. I never mentioned current generation consoles not even implicitly. I always talked either about the N64 or (gaming) devices that are constrained and cannot run linux.

laumars 6y ago
Except you did: “I think that Nintendo might use Microkernels [in the Switch] according to reverse engeneering finds shows their massive potential for constrained devices.” Maybe you hadn’t grokked that pjmlp was talking about the Switch (Nintendo’s current generation console) rather than the N64? Either way, my other comment[0] also applies: [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25559670 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25559670
- tutfbhuf 6y ago
  Execpt that you entered "[in the Switch]" from your own imagination and it's simply not there in my original comment. > Nintendo actual devices use microkernel based designs. We are way past the usual FUD against microkernels. Regarding pjmlp post, yes that's true, it wasn't clear (and still isn't) to me from his post, that he specifically speaks about the Switch when referring to "devices".
  - laumars 6y ago
    > Execpt that you entered "[in the Switch]" from your own imagination and it's simply not there in my original comment. I know it’s not there in your original comment, that’s why it was inside square brackets. That’s a standard way of including context in a quote that otherwise would lack said context. You would see that in news papers and other publications. This isn’t some weird markup I’ve just invented and it’s definitely not a figment of my imagination because the post you were replying to was about the Switch. > Regarding pjmlp post, yes that's true, it wasn't clear (and still isn't) to me from his post, that he specifically speaks about the Switch when referring to "devices". You’re right, it wasn’t explicit. My apologies there.
    - tutfbhuf 6y ago
      > I know it’s not there in your original comment [and I'm sorry that I have abused the square brackets in such a way, that it changes the meaning] ... My apologies there. [No problem.]
      - laumars 6y ago
        I wasn’t changing the meaning though. You were replying to a post about Switch. It’s not my fault you can’t grasp enough of this stuff to hold an intellectual discussion.
  - deleted 6y ago
    [deleted]

laumars 6y ago

Except you did: “I think that Nintendo might use Microkernels [in the Switch] according to reverse engeneering finds shows their massive potential for constrained devices.” Maybe you hadn’t grokked that pjmlp was talking about the Switch (Nintendo’s current generation console) rather than the N64? Either way, my other comment[0] also applies: [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25559670 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25559670

tutfbhuf 6y ago
Execpt that you entered "[in the Switch]" from your own imagination and it's simply not there in my original comment. > Nintendo actual devices use microkernel based designs. We are way past the usual FUD against microkernels. Regarding pjmlp post, yes that's true, it wasn't clear (and still isn't) to me from his post, that he specifically speaks about the Switch when referring to "devices".
- laumars 6y ago
  > Execpt that you entered "[in the Switch]" from your own imagination and it's simply not there in my original comment. I know it’s not there in your original comment, that’s why it was inside square brackets. That’s a standard way of including context in a quote that otherwise would lack said context. You would see that in news papers and other publications. This isn’t some weird markup I’ve just invented and it’s definitely not a figment of my imagination because the post you were replying to was about the Switch. > Regarding pjmlp post, yes that's true, it wasn't clear (and still isn't) to me from his post, that he specifically speaks about the Switch when referring to "devices". You’re right, it wasn’t explicit. My apologies there.
  - tutfbhuf 6y ago
    > I know it’s not there in your original comment [and I'm sorry that I have abused the square brackets in such a way, that it changes the meaning] ... My apologies there. [No problem.]
    - laumars 6y ago
      I wasn’t changing the meaning though. You were replying to a post about Switch. It’s not my fault you can’t grasp enough of this stuff to hold an intellectual discussion.
- deleted 6y ago
  [deleted]