3 ms·

Can be is not is. One can rewrite that in a functional not implace style. Less so for a language with a c like call stack. Which is why the op wrote it like tha

by konjin 6y ago

Can be is not is. One can rewrite that in a functional not implace style. Less so for a language with a c like call stack. Which is why the op wrote it like that instead of using tail call recursion.

lispm 6y ago
> instead of using tail call recursion If your language supports that. TCO is not a standard feature of Lisp.
- konjin 6y ago
  Regular recursion however is.