> is not meant condescending but literally. Ergo, if you don't care about memory management (which is fine), then feel free to use lots of STL stuff. I don't s

> is not meant condescending but literally. Ergo, if you don't care about memory management (which is fine), then feel free to use lots of STL stuff. I don't see it that way. Plenty of people care about memory management and also see the STL as a fine tool to use. Little is gained from a memory management perspective by avoiding e.g. std::vector. Whether condescension is intended or not, this definitely comes across as talking down to me, and worse, it is incorrect.